When it comes to software solutions, business owners don’t have many choices. They can buy an off-the-shelf tool, hire in-house software developers to create a custom solution, or outsource the project to a specialized vendor.
Our team surveyed technology leaders from around 200 companies across Switzerland, Germany, and the UK, representing industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, to identify the options their companies most commonly choose.
It turns out, most of them combine custom software development with ready-made solutions, often partnering with external software development providers to bring their custom projects to life. Yet, not all are entirely satisfied with the outcomes.
In this comprehensive guide, we’ll share key findings from our survey, highlighting the top concerns technology leaders have about working with external providers. We’ll also explore how full-cycle software development services, when done right, can address these challenges.
In software development outsourcing, two primary collaboration models dominate the market: dedicated teams and full-cycle software development.
With the right vendor, both models can help you deliver a successful project, but they differ significantly in terms of structure, responsibility distribution, and control over the development process.
So let’s take a closer look at each of these models.
Outsourcing your software development project using a dedicated team model gives you complete control over every aspect of the project, including the team, product backlog, daily tasks, and priorities. In other words, you integrate an external team into your workflows and manage them as if they were part of your internal workforce.
A software development vendor provides the talent, but you oversee the day-to-day operations and decision-making within the team.
The main thing to keep in mind about the dedicated development team model is that you’ll need to stay actively involved and manage the project from start to finish. You’re in the driver’s seat, so the responsibility for project success rests entirely on your shoulders.
Here is how this model typically works.
Step 1: Needs assessment
Normally, the collaboration starts with your outsourcing partner assessing the project to understand your technology staffing needs.This includes defining the necessary roles, skills, experience, seniority levels, and any other critical requirements to ensure the team we build is perfectly suited to your project.
Step 2: Team allocation
Using the requirements you’ve provided, we assemble a team of experts specifically tailored to your project. You can expect 1-2 core developers to be ready to start within the first couple of weeks.
Step 3: Candidate presentation
At this stage, you’re provided with a shortlist of highly qualified candidates, including their resumes and skill sets, for your review. You’ll have the opportunity to interview our developers to ensure they fit your company culture and meet your exact requirements.
Step 4: Onboarding & Integration
Now your dedicated team is fully briefed on your key project goals, product vision, and workflows. Each team member is integrated into your organization. Your partner handles the transition and ensures immediate productivity.
Step 5: Project kick-off
Once your team is fully set up and onboarded, you can officially kick off the project. When partnering with Modeso, we’ll coordinate your dedicated team and establish clear communication channels through a project manager and technical lead for smooth project execution.
Step 6: Ongoing support & talent retention
High turnover can disrupt dedicated development teams, which is why we prioritize talent retention. We carefully manage this process to ensure your team remains stable, providing you with peace of mind that your project will progress smoothly without disruptions.
In our experience, the dedicated team model works best for startups or companies where software development is core. If you have established software development processes in place, and are ready to be fully involved in the development process, this is a model to go for.
While some large enterprises, like those we interviewed, may consider the dedicated team model, it may not always be the best fit. This is because enterprises often have complex structures and extensive internal processes that can slow down collaboration and decision-making. They may face challenges in fully integrating external teams and maintaining consistent oversight, making it harder to achieve the seamless alignment required for success in a dedicated team model.
Full-cycle software development is the model where an outsourcing software development provider takes complete responsibility for managing the development process. Your partner oversees the timeline, ensures quality, and deals with any risks associated with your project. With this model, you can rely on your partner to handle all project-related nuances with minimal oversight on your part.
Our full-cycle projects are structured around four key stages: Alignment, Design, Development, and Maintenance & Growth.
We break the development process into small iterations with user validation at each step to keep things moving fast, catch issues early, build the right thing, and avoid expensive fixes later. This way, through constant testing and functionality refinement, we deliver a high-quality product.
Step 1: Alignment
We take the time to thoroughly understand your business, its challenges, and objectives, ensuring a strong foundation for a successful partnership. This allows us to align our efforts with your vision and set clear expectations from the outset.
During this phase, we:
Step 2: Design
We take a user-centered design approach, focusing on understanding the needs and preferences of your target audience to ensure that the final product not only meets functional requirements but also fosters high user adoption and satisfaction.
Key design activities include:
Step 3: Development
Our solutions are built with scalability and adaptability in mind, ensuring they can evolve alongside your business as it grows. We focus on creating robust, flexible systems that can handle future demands while maintaining high performance and efficiency.
Our development best practices include:
Step 4: Maintenance and growth
After the initial release, we focus on maintaining seamless operations and continuously enhancing the functionality of your software to meet evolving needs and ensure long-term success.
Our post-launch services cover:
Full-cycle software development offers an end-to-end approach that is ideal for large enterprises with complex needs. Enterprises benefit from having a single team responsible for all stages of software development — planning, design, development, testing, deployment, and maintenance.
The full-cycle approach is also particularly beneficial for organizations seeking to maintain control over their projects while ensuring that all aspects of development align with their business goals. It facilitates improved communication between teams, reduces the likelihood of miscommunication, and fosters a culture of continuous improvement. By leveraging a comprehensive approach to full-cycle development, companies can avoid the pitfalls associated with disjointed development efforts, ultimately leading to enhanced user satisfaction and better overall project success.
Since a single team handles the entire project, there is less risk of delays or issues arising from coordinating multiple external providers. The model ensures a more predictable timeline and execution, reducing operational risks for large organizations.
However, this approach comes with trade-offs, including reduced control and potential challenges such as cultural differences, communication gaps, limited understanding of your business needs, and other alignment issues.
These challenges are not just theoretical — they reflect real-world concerns shared by business leaders in our survey.
Read on as we explore them in more detail below.
For now though, let's talk about ROI.
Full-cycle software development delivers measurable results that directly impact your bottom line. Based on our client case studies and industry benchmarks, enterprises typically experience:
Our case studies demonstrate the tangible value of full-cycle development:
Albin Kistler - Investment Portfolio Analytics Platform
Challenge: 15-year-old proprietary system with expensive release cycles and extensive bugs
Solution: Complete platform modernization with cloud-native architecture
Results:
Read more in our case study.
TWINT - Mobile Payment Ecosystem
Challenge: Expanding ecosystem with three new digital products requiring complex integrations
Solution: Scalable architecture handling 150,000+ orders per hour
Results: Enhanced user engagement and transaction frequency
Read more in our case study.
Visana - Health Insurance Referral Program
Challenge: Build MVP in 2 months for market validation
Solution: Low-risk integration strategy with cost-effective GCP deployment
Results: Successful MVP leading to replication for partner organizations
Read more in our case study.
Based on insights from our survey of nearly 200 tech leaders across companies in Switzerland, Germany, and the UK, here are the most common concerns about software development outsourcing highlighted by our respondents.
"I insist on having a communication partner in Switzerland with the understanding of how business is done here."
- a responder from survey
The challenge: Differences in work ethics, values, and how people communicate can cause significant problems in software development projects.
The full-cycle solution: Choose a partner who aligns with your company's culture, understands your business goals, and adapts to your preferred communication and collaboration style. Local partners who have worked with companies in your industry or region help mitigate cultural differences and foster a shared sense of purpose.
Modeso's approach: Unlike most outsourcing providers who have project coordinators working in offshore locations, we assign a product owner based in Switzerland. This person truly understands the DACH culture and speaks German, eliminating cultural differences and language barriers.
“Cultural and language barriers and how they can impact collaboration and understanding of projects. This can lead to deliverables not being as good or taking longer sometimes.”
- a technology leader from our survey
The challenge: When team members don't speak the same language fluently, important details can be lost in translation, slowing progress and affecting work quality.
The full-cycle solution: Choose a partner with strong language proficiency in your preferred working language and ensure key team members, such as project managers or team leads, have excellent communication skills.
Our advantage: Our product development teams are located in Switzerland and speak German. They can visit your office and work with your team in your location. By bridging cultural and communication gaps, we create an outsourcing experience that feels like working with an in-house team.
“It [offshore outsourcing] can sometimes work but it needs good controls and great communication.”
- a respondent from our survey
“We give priority to local partners: they can be in our offices and communication is easy.”
- a survey respondent from Switzerland
The challenge: If you work with an outsourcing partner located miles away, miscommunication problems tend to multiply. Time zone differences, cultural gaps, and limited face-to-face interactions make it harder to maintain alignment and resolve problems quickly.
The full-cycle solution: To prevent such an outcome, there should be proper coordination and clear ownership so that everyone moves toward the same goals.
Our approach: At Modeso, we have Product Owners, located locally in Switzerland. These are stakeholders responsible for product success, not just the project’s scope. Product Owners ensure every change is communicated clearly to the development team so there are no outdated requirements, no wasted time, and no inflated costs.
"Hidden costs and unclear pricing models make it impossible to budget properly. We need complete transparency from day one."
- a finance industry respondent
The challenge: It's difficult to evaluate if services justify the expense when outsourcing companies aren't clear about pricing or deliverables.
The full-cycle solution: Demand detailed cost breakdowns with measurable deliverables and vendor accountability for providing those deliverables.
Our pricing model: We provide transparent engagements with clear deliverable milestones. Our blended delivery model combines Swiss-based product management with cost-effective development from our tech hubs, delivering high-quality solutions at competitive prices.
"Delays cascade through our entire business. We need partners who take full accountability for delivery timelines, not just estimates."
- an enterprise technology executive
The challenge: Projects rarely go as planned, and delays can snowball if not addressed promptly. When the task expected to take two weeks stretches into a month, you need to address this here and now.
The full-cycle solution: Work with partners who take full responsibility for timeline management and have proven track records of on-time delivery.
Our methodology: We use Lean methodology to ensure fast time-to-market and efficient software development. By focusing on delivering a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) with validated features, we allow you to start getting value quickly while minimizing delivery risks.
“In regulated business such as insurance, we need to be careful as our data must not leave the country.”
- an insurance industry survey participant
“Swiss solutions are better.”
- a survey participant from Switzerland
“Don’t do [offshore outsourcing], all in Switzerland.”
- a technology leader, our survey participant
“Rather have the development team within Germany.”
- a survey participant from Germany
The full-cycle solution: Choose local vendors who understand your regulatory environment and can ensure strict security protocol compliance.
Our compliance advantage: We don't send your data outside the DACH region. Your project is managed from Zurich, and your data is fully compliant with the highest security and regulatory standards. This makes Modeso the perfect partner for DACH businesses requiring strict data governance.
Also check out: Secure SDLC in full-cycle software development
All these concerns lead us to the following conclusion:
With a reputable local vendor, who speaks your language and understands your business, you have a stronger chance for a successful project.
While the core principles of full-cycle development remain consistent, the approach must be tailored to meet the unique regulatory, security, and operational requirements of different industries.
Here's how our methodology adapts to address industry-specific challenges:
Regulatory complexity: Industries like healthcare and finance operate under strict regulatory frameworks that require specialized compliance knowledge. Our full-cycle approach incorporates regulatory requirements from the design phase, ensuring compliance is built into the architecture rather than retrofitted later.
Security requirements: Different industries have varying security standards. Financial services require PCI DSS compliance and real-time fraud detection, while healthcare demands HIPAA compliance and patient data protection. Our security-by-design approach adapts these requirements into every development phase.
Integration complexity: Each industry has established ecosystems of legacy systems and third-party services. Our system integration expertise ensures seamless connectivity with existing infrastructure, whether it's EHR systems in healthcare or core banking platforms in finance.
User experience expectations: Industries serve different user bases with distinct needs. Healthcare applications prioritize clinical workflow efficiency, while fintech solutions focus on transaction speed and security. Our user-centered design approach adapts to these specific requirements.
Here are a couple of examples.
Healthcare organizations require specialized expertise for regulatory compliance and data security. Our approach to full-cycle development for healthcare includes:
Financial institutions need robust, secure, and compliant solutions. Our full-cycle development expertise in fintech covers:
We track the following metrics across all project phases: timeline performance, quality and business impact.
Timeline performance. We track things like milestone achievement rates, time-to-market measurements and sprint velocity.
Quality. We track defect density and resolution rates, user acceptance test pass rates and production incident frequencies.
Business impact: Since we support our clients in their entire product development journey, including post-launch, we measure user adoption and engagement rates and cost savings our clients achieve by working with us.
Selecting the right partner is crucial for full-cycle development success. Here are key evaluation criteria:
Industry knowledge:
Development capabilities:
Communication and collaboration:
Business understanding:
Process maturity:
Track record:
As artificial intelligence transforms the world, full-cycle development must evolve to incorporate AI capabilities from conception to deployment. At Modeso, we've been developing AI-integrated solutions that deliver business value while managing complexity and costs effectively.
Here is exactly how we do it.
AI-specific project management: Unlike traditional software projects that follow predictable development lifecycles, AI projects require specialized AI project management approaches. Our full-cycle methodology incorporates Cognitive Project Management for AI (CPMAI), which integrates Agile principles with data-centric focus and continuous model refinement.
Smart AI integration strategy: Rather than building AI from scratch, we help enterprises adopt a "Think Big, Start Small" approach. This involves:
Cost-effective AI implementation: Our approach to building cost-effective LLM applications using frameworks like LangChain enables rapid development while managing generative AI integration costs effectively.
Agentic AI for enterprise: As we outlined in our analysis of how AI agents will rewrite enterprise software, the next wave of enterprise applications won't just use AI. They'll be built around it. This fundamental shift affects how full-cycle development approaches software architecture and user interaction. Rather than monolithic software suites, we anticipate smaller, specialized tools connected and orchestrated by intelligent AI agent layers that understand business processes and coordinate workflows automatically. And instead of complex dashboards, there will be ChatGPT-style interactions where users describe what they need in natural language.
Full-cycle development matters most when it removes the biggest outsourcing risks: misalignment, broken communication, and unpredictable delivery. Your survey narrative points to a simple takeaway: tech leaders don’t just need extra hands — they need a partner who can own outcomes end-to-end and stay close to the business context so timelines and expectations don’t drift.
Looking ahead, this becomes even more important as AI changes how products are built and operated. A strong full-cycle partner can help you introduce AI in a controlled way (from design to deployment) without creating new chaos — because the real differentiator isn’t the model, but process maturity, security discipline, and the ability to execute reliably.
Privacy is important to us, so you have the option of disabling certain types of storage that may not be necessary for the basic functioning of the website. Blocking categories may impact your experience on the website. More information
